That's true of almost all of them, which is why it doesn't tell you who to call. What tells you is pressure. A company that just cut staff. One that just got bought. One that's hiring four people to do the same repetitive job. Those are the ones worth an email this month, and there's a public trace for each. Here's what we'd watch.
Book a 30 min callOne thing shapes the whole build. Your market isn't huge and every deal is worth a lot. Email someone at the wrong moment and they're gone for a year, and there's no second version of that company to try later. So we'd go slow and pick carefully, and spend most of the sending on companies with a reason to reply this week.
| What your site says | How we'd spot it |
|---|---|
| "No single executive owns outcomes" | True of nearly everyone, so this one can't narrow anything down |
| "One department experiments on its own. Another purchases a tool without a policy." | Different AI tools named in job ads across different teams, with no AI policy and nobody holding the title |
| "Board/CEO pressure to 'do something with AI,' but no clear path forward" | AI language on their website with nobody behind it |
| "CFO skepticism and a need for measurable ROI before funding" | A new CFO, or a round of cost cuts |
| "Stalled Pilots" | An AI announcement about a year old, then nothing since |
| "Operations teams at headcount ceiling with high-volume repetitive workflows" | Three or more openings for the same repetitive job at once |
| "Manual process debt in project documentation and compliance workflows" | A big new project win, permit filings, or a certification they're chasing |
| PE-backed leaders "needing fast results" (your white papers say this three times) | Bought or funded in the last three months |
| # | Name | What we look for | Where we find it | Heat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | Failed CAIO search | A job ad for a full-time AI leader that's been sitting open 45 days or more, or been reposted | TheirStack, PredictLeads, LinkedIn Jobs | Hot |
S2 | Hiring the workflow | Three or more openings at once for the same repetitive job: order entry, AP clerk, project coordinator, scheduler, document control, permits, claims | TheirStack, PredictLeads | Hot |
S3 | New money | Bought, merged or funded in the last three months, including PE deals | Deal news, Exa, event data | Timing |
| # | Name | What we look for | Where we find it | Heat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
S4 | New boss | A CEO, President, COO, CFO or owner who has been in the chair under nine months | Sales Nav alerts, people data | Timing |
S5 | Cost cuts | Layoffs or a cost-cutting announcement in the last three months | Event data, WARN filings, news | Timing |
S6 | Talks AI, owns nothing | AI language on their site, checked against having no AI title and no published policy | Site keywords plus a title check | Hot |
S7 | Looks like your clients | Companies shaped like DEB Construction, ToursByLocals and Frazer | Sales Nav, company data | Good fit |
S8 | Already runs on 90 days | Runs EOS, Scaling Up or quarterly rocks. CEO sits in Vistage or YPO | Coach directories, LinkedIn | Good fit |
S9 | Paperwork pile-up | A big public contract win, permit filings, an ISO or AS certification push, a recall or inspection | SAM.gov, permit data, NHTSA, Exa | Timing |
All nine can be looked up. That matters more than it sounds. A signal you can't query is just a theory, and it never becomes a list anyone can work. Section 06 covers the ones we left off and why.
| Signal | What we'd pitch | Your price | Why that one |
|---|---|---|---|
| S2 hiring the workflow · S5 cost cuts | Done and Running | $27,000 | There's a specific job already costing them money. Fixed fee, clear deliverables, easy yes |
| S3 new money · S4 new boss | AI ROI Blueprint | $10,000 | They need a plan before they need a build. New money and new bosses both want to see the thinking first |
| S6 talks AI, owns nothing | AI Leadership Kickstart Day | $12,000 | Your Kickstart page was written for this company. AI is already running loose and nobody's steering |
| S1 failed CAIO search | Embedded Fractional CAIO | $54,000/cycle | They've already decided they need the role filled. Your headline answers it: without hiring someone full time |
| S9 paperwork pile-up | Done and Running | $27,000 | This is the DEB Construction job. Site reports, inspections, compliance paperwork |
| Already has an AI chief | Strategic Oversight or a certification | $43,500/cycle or $12,000 | Never pitch the fractional role into a filled seat. Sell them rhythm or training instead |
Don't open with the $54,000 cycle. Nobody buys that off a cold email. It's what the first step turns into once you're inside and it's working. Every play above lands small on purpose.
| How often | What we check | Why that often | What happens |
|---|---|---|---|
Weekly | S1 stale job ads · S2 duplicate roles · S4 new bosses | Job ads and title changes move quickly, and a role that just hit 45 days open is a different conversation than one posted yesterday | Enriched and emailed that week, while the ad's still up |
Monthly | S3 deals and funding · S5 cost cuts · S9 contract wins, permits, certifications | These show up as announcements and stay relevant for a few months, so checking weekly just adds noise | Bundled into that month's batch |
Once, then watch | S6 companies talking about AI with nobody accountable | This one barely moves. Worth one full pass early, then a light watch for new ones | Swept in the first weeks, then alerts on new entrants |
Always | S7 lookalikes · S8 already runs on 90 days | These are about fit, not timing, so they never expire and never go stale | Steady background flow, turned down when the timing signals are busy |
Check before sending | Do they already have an AI chief? | Pitching a fractional exec into a filled seat loses the room immediately | Sent to Strategic Oversight or a certification instead |
The weekly ones do most of the work. They refresh on their own, so there's always a fresh batch of companies with a real reason to hear from you, and we never have to reach for people who have no reason to reply. The always-on list fills whatever room is left, and we turn it down when the timing signals are producing.
One we're keeping, but parking. A company that announced an AI project a year ago and has gone quiet since is probably stuck, which is the first problem card on your homepage. It's arguably the best signal on this page. It just needs a year of history collected before it produces anything, so it comes later than the rest.
After that it compounds. Push harder on whichever signals closed, ease off the rest, open the private equity channel, and stand the certification side up on its own. For the first call we'd skip the deck and bring the actual company names currently firing on the hiring and new-money signals, filtered to companies shaped like DEB and ToursByLocals.
Three things to confirm before we build anything. How small a company you'll actually take, because it decides how wide the steady list runs. Which client results and logos we're allowed to name. And which product names are current, because your 30-day sprint page calls the flagship "AI in Your Corner," the audit "The AI Audit" and the Kickstart Day "AI Executive Quickstart," while every other page uses different names for the same things at the same prices. Emails and landing pages have to agree.
Thirty minutes. We walk through all nine signals, the routing map, and the accounts each signal is firing on right now. If it is not a fit we will say so on the call.
Book a 30 min call